On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:54:40 +0200 Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 16.07.20 14:02, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:26:20 -0400 > > Collin Walling <wall...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > >> On 7/15/20 12:04 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:36:35 -0400 > >>> Collin Walling <wall...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Polite ping. Patches have been sitting on the list for a few weeks now, > >>>> and it doesn't look like any further changes are requested (hopefully I > >>>> didn't miss something). > >>> > >>> The only thing I had was (I think) the logging of the length you just > >>> replied to. We can still tweak things like that later, of course. > >>> > >>> As these patches depend on a headers sync, I could not yet queue them. > >>> I can keep a preliminary version on a branch. I assume that the header > >>> changes will go in during the next kernel merge window? (If I missed > >>> something, apologies for that.) > >>> > >> > >> Gotcha. Thanks for the update :) > >> > >> There was an email on the KVM list a couple of days that made one change > >> to the Linux header. Just changed the integer used for the DIAG cap, > >> which should be reflected in QEMU as well. > >> > >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg220548.html > >> > >> Should I respin this patch series to include the new ack's and account > >> for the header sync? > > > > No need for that, my tooling picks up acks and the headers update needs > > to be replaced with a sync against a proper Linux version anyway. > > > > I've queued the patches on a local branch, and the only patch that did > > not apply cleanly was the headers patch, which will get replaced later > > anyway :) Just ping me when the kernel patches hit upstream, then I'll > > do a header sync against the next -rc and queue the patches on > > s390-next. > > What is the status of this patchset? The kernel part has been merged in > 5.9-rc1. > Thanks for letting me know, I'll go and process this now. (Had some busy weeks + PTO.)