On 9/21/21 08:02, WANG Xuerui wrote:
On 9/21/21 01:23, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 9/20/21 1:04 AM, WANG Xuerui wrote:
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <g...@xen0n.name>
---
configure | 4 +++-
meson.build | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
If there's no loongarch32, and never will be, then there's probably no
point in keeping the '64' suffix.
The loongarch32 tuple will most certainly come into existence some time
in the future, but probably bare-metal-only and without a Linux port
AFAIK. That's a point the Loongson people and I didn't communicate well,
apologizes for that. (While we're at it, the reserved "loongarchx32"
which is x32/n32-like, most likely will never exist.)
Are you trying to beat MIPS at their ABI complexity? /s
