On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 18:25, Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 9/20/21 1:04 AM, WANG Xuerui wrote: > > Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <g...@xen0n.name>
> Be consistent with loongarch or loongarch64 everywhere. > > If there's no loongarch32, and never will be, then there's probably no point > in keeping > the '64' suffix. What does Linux 'uname -m' call the architecture, and what is the name in the gcc triplet? Generally I think we should prefer to follow those precedents (which hopefully don't point in different directions) rather than making up our own architecture names. thanks -- PMM
