On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:46 AM Richard Henderson < richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 9/6/22 13:22, Christoph Muellner wrote: > > + DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C906, > rv64_thead_c906_cpu_init), > > + DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C910, > rv64_thead_c906_cpu_init), > > Why model both if they're identical? > I figured that users might expect that (existence of "thead-c906" and "thead-c910"). And using "thead-c9xx" feels like it would be regretted in the future. Should I drop "thead-c910"? > > > r~ >
