On 8/30/23 14:34, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
SM501 is going to depend on PIXMAN next.
Why is this patch needed when SM501 is the one that depends on PIXMAN
and should pull in the dependency? Also what's the change in
default.mak?
The change in default.mak is needed because the default is moved from
there to hw/ppc/Kconfig. Without it,
# configs/devices/ppc-softmmu/default.mak
CONFIG_SAM460EX=y
# hw/ppc/Kconfig
config SAM460EX
depends on PPC && PIXMAN
fails to compile without pixman, due to a contradiction (default.mak
requires enabling SAM460EX, hw/ppc/Kconfig requires disabling it because
CONFIG_PIXMAN=n).
ati-vga also uses pixman and currently has no fall back.
The sm501 already has fallback when pixman fails so could work without
pixman too, see x-pixman property in sm501.c.
Yeah, this means there are changes needed in both this patch and ATI.
Paolo
