Hi Giovanni,
I need to change all pixels that have the value of 249 to a value of
255. All other pixels should stay at their value.
Andreas
Am 2014-11-19 10:21, schrieb G. Allegri:
From my grayscale tiff images I want to replace one pixel value
(249) with white (255). All other pixels should stay at the value they
have.
>
> I came across https://github.com/chiatt/gdal_reclassify [1] - but
this reclassifies all pixels, not only selected ones.
>
> Maybe I could use http://www.gdal.org/gdal_calc.html [2] with a
conditional syntax?
Hi Andreas, do you need to change the value of one specific pixel
only? I mean the pixel at [x,y] index?
giovanni
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>
> Am 2014-11-19 09:10, schrieb Carlos López PSIG:
>>
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> I also had problems to reclassify BIGTIFF with SAGA and GRASS!
>> Finally I used GDAL!
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> [2]
>>
>> CARLOS LÓPEZ QUINTANILLA
>>
>> www.psig.es [3] [2]
>>
>> carlos.lo...@psig.es
>> +34 699.680.261
>>
>> 2014-11-19 9:05 GMT+01:00 Andreas Neumann <a.neum...@carto.net>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I tried various tools, e.g.
>>>
>>> * SAGA reclassify
>>> * GRASS r.mapcalc
>>>
>>> Both work fine on smaller data sets, but fail on big data sets.
>>>
>>> This is on Win7 64bit, with the OSGeo4W installer. I have 8gb RAM
>>> and 40GB disk free on C:, more free space on other disks where
the
>>> data resides.
>>>
>>> I am not totally sure if it is the Bigtiff issue or some other
>>> issue. It is just a guess that maybe I am hitting a limit with
tiff.
>>> It is not fully transparent to me what Processing is doing in the
>>> background (what file formats with what options it creates).
>>>
>>> It may also be an issue with SAGA or GRASS directly.
>>>
>>> Thanks if you know anything,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> Am 2014-11-18 21:15, schrieb Giovanni Manghi:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am having a lot of troubles with large raster files and
>>> processing.
>>>
>>> The intermediate results can go >4GB. Processing stops with not
so
>>> helpful error messages.
>>>
>>> I wonder if processing is hitting the 4GB limit. Can I force
>>> processing
>>> to use the BIGTIFF option or a raster format that can handle >4GB
>>> files?
>>>
>>> Hi Andreas, what tool specifically?
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> -- Giovanni --
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>>> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer [4] [1]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer [4] [1]
>>
>>
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer [4]
>> [2] http://www.psig.es [3]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer [4]
Links:
------
[1] https://github.com/chiatt/gdal_reclassify
[2] http://www.gdal.org/gdal_calc.html
[3] http://www.psig.es
[4] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
