On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 09:25, Alexandre Neto <senhor.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As an user and member of a user group, the message does not offend at all. > This is something we struggle to explain to users and it's a good opportunity > to send the message. > > I prefer a long version instead of just a link (many won't click on it) > > I am not a native english speaker, but I think using something like "consider > sponsoring" instead of "you can sponsor". > > Also the term "fast track" for me is not very clear for me, again as > non-native english speaker.
What I'm trying to convey here is that there's a chance the ticket will be addressed without sponsorship, but if they DO sponsor it will get addressed immediately. So "fast track" here means something a little like "short cut". Is there better wording you think may convey this same meaning? Nyall > > Other than that +1 > > Alexandre Neto > > A quinta, 7/01/2021, 08:33, Matthias Kuhn <matth...@opengis.ch> escreveu: >> >> Hi Nyall, >> >> I would also appreciate a hint like this. >> Maybe it could be done even more subtle by shortening this text and adding a >> link to a page "learn how to make things progress"? >> >> I'd also very much appreciate the voices of users on this topic (that's a >> classical "we don't only want to hear the dev side" topic). >> >> Matthias >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1:42 AM Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> I've a small request to consider for stale bot and issues/feature >>> requests. I think that if a ticket remains open for say > 90 days >>> since the last comment, it would be nice if stale bot added a comment >>> like: >>> >>> "Unfortunately this bug/feature request has not seen any solution in >>> the recent QGIS release. If this fix/feature is important to you or >>> your organisation, you can help to fast-track its development by >>> sponsoring this work. To do so, contact one of the QGIS commercial >>> support providers listed at ... to discuss how you could fund this >>> functionality". >>> >>> I think it's a non-threatening, non-begging way to advise bug >>> reporters on the alternative ways they can fast track development in >>> QGIS. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Nyall >>> _______________________________________________ >>> QGIS-Developer mailing list >>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org >>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer