Hi Johannes, Thank you a lot for your return, appreciated !
Best, Rhea > On 3 Nov 2023, at 9:35 AM, Johannes Kröger (WhereGroup) via QGIS-Developer > <qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > Hi Rhea, > > I am in no way able to officially answer but maybe I can give some thoughts > and rhetoric questions: > > To me those improvements sound like good ideas. I am not sure how far you > could lock down Python extensibility considering the existing API. And I am > not sure if you are aware of the many ways that a QGIS environment might use > network calls, e.g. a tool like Proj might download grids from the internet > in some cases, GDAL might try to fetch schemas specified in local files, etc. > Sandboxing the system from the outside is probably much easier and secure. > > Are those 40 extensions existing extensions? Are you aware that you can strip > out the official repository and use your own instead? > > It would probably be best to create QGIS Enhancement Proposals at > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues. > > And it would be good to proof commitment to maintaining the new features in > some way or enter the sustaining membership program with significant, > recurring contributions so that other developers paid by the QGIS project can > maintain them. > > Cheers, Hannes > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
