> So, essentially, throwing muck at Quanta is part of the problem.
> It's an information and opinion overload that prevents any
> concensus. half the people are for something. Half the people are
> against something. There's lots of overlap. Paralysis!
In a business there is only one who takes decisions. Can be dangerous but
also very successfull.
In a democracy people are elected on a program, and then they more or less do
what they said.
Are the decisions at Quanta "top level" made according to one of these
schemes?
Arnould
WebMail / Magic OnLine
http://www.magic.fr
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
