-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 jms1 schrieb: > The original idea was to write the parser in archive but in view of > the feedback I think we had better think again. Perhaps SuperBasic > might be better. Any thoughts?
SuperBASIC would be **much** better! wolfgang -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCPJ0uL0KE6Q1yFDcRAp15AJ9dGCYDx9dm2ncywVgoESpz6M3JbwCfUw+J KapugkU7sgSE5iziD9HRvDw= =ES38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
