In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
Tubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
At 17:45 24/04/2005 +0100, you wrote:
But when I recently furnished him with information he had asked for
it was not even acknowledged nor a relevant enquiry answered.
I thought we had a brief and acrimonious exchange and some of the
information was wrong. I must admit I did misread part of it to start
with but some of the statements you made were not right.
Did you post for details of the mentioned fast emulator ?
Did you receive my post made some 4hours later ?
Did you read it ?
Did you acknowledge it ?
Did you respond to it ?
At the end of your post you said. 'So I will end this exchange' or word
to that effect and accused me of 'verbiage'. I decided not to reply.
And you accuse me of being aggressive?
Seemingly NO to the last two at least.
I certainly made the assumption the PC floppy ribbon would do the job,
nothing to try it out on just now. So what other "statements " were
wrong
Why am I wasting my time answering you now? That is the real question.
--
Roy Wood
Q Branch. 20 Locks Hill, Portslade, Sussex.BN41 2LB
Tel: +44 (0) 1273 386030 fax: +44 (0) 1273 430501 skype : royqbranch
web : www.qbranch.demon.co.uk
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
