--------------------------------------------------
From: <matras...@aol.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 7:49 PM
To: <ql-us...@q-v-d.com>
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Finally a reply - from the Treasurer
Hi Geoff,
Suggest you look up transactional analysis in google especially critical
parent and willful child roles.
In law in the UK there is a differentiation between criminal and civil
law. Any perceived violations of Quanta's constitution will fall in to
civil law, unless you are suggesting fraud according to the criminal
definition of this. If not then if there is a legal case to be made
because of some injury, someone, an individual or group of individuals,
needs to sue. It seems on this list at the moment only you feel there is a
case to be made. The question then is are you going to sue Quanta. If not
then what is your purpose.
Answer a simple question, but the answer has to be not as a layman would
answer but as a lawyer would answer:
Can a person who has been appointed treasurer of Quanta in a breach of the
constitution - a legally binding document - legally sign cheques under
British law?
Best Wishes,
Geoff
_____
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
