On 31 Jan 2013, at 17:31, Ian Burkinshaw wrote: > Hi Norman > > I do read them. But up until recently I have not had the time, to get down > and learn it all. Some of it I do not fully understand. But if I started to > learn it properly, I am sure it would make much more sense. > > The way Easy68K, displays things does make it more understandable, at least > to me anyway. > > For example I have never realy understood which registers are used for what. > Also managing the stack is not clear to me either. But to be fair I have not > studied it that closely. > > I realy must go back to the start of your series in QLT, and re-read it all, > and start to work though your examples. > > I have played with some the PRT stuff in your more recent articles, which has > been of great interest to me. But have to admit I have not understood it all. > That is down my lack of knowledge, not your work. Since one of my planed > projects whould most likely be better done in MC. > > Ian > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Norman Dunbar" <nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk> > To: <ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:54 PM > Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Easy68K > > >> On 31/01/13 16:51, Ian Burkinshaw wrote: >>> Must admit I have always kept away from machine code. >> Hmmm. Do my QL Today articles on the matter, since many many years ago, not >> inspire you? :-( >> >> Cheers, >> Norm. >>
Although I have programmed in Assembler from years back on IBM and Ferranti machines as well as the QL it is only after reading Norman's articles that I find that Assembler is actually easier than SuperBASIC and much, much easier than C. George _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
