On 20 Mar 2013, at 12:26, Geoff Wicks wrote: > > Why do we have to think in terms of a magazine? > > What's wrong with a (simple) rolling website?
A website would cope with odd items of news and, mainly non varying lists of office bearers etc, but is not really suitable for the set of articles which also appear in QL Today (and QUANTA). In fact I now have the QUANTA magazine sent by email and find it in many ways more convenient than by post. It arrives sooner and it has clickable links. But I rarely look at the Quanta website. I would much prefer a PDF magazine to a website. George _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
