IPad 3 :(
On 24 Oct 2013 20:11, "Dave Park" <d...@sinclairql.com> wrote:

> I haven't personally experienced that, but I have heard a couple of friends
> have that issue - they both have iPad 2's - which do you have? My iPad mini
> works flawlessly with Skype, but I rarely use it for that.
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Lee Privett <lee.priv...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Video on iPad didn't work for me
> > On 24 Oct 2013 19:36, "Dave Park" <d...@sinclairql.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I have used Skype on iOS 3 thru 7 on iPhones 2, 4, 4s and 5, without
> > > problems. I *have* had one set of problems with Skype due to skype's
> own
> > > server issues, but that was in 2008 and has not recurred. They were hit
> > by
> > > problems for several days that affected a call to my mom in England.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Lee Privett <lee.priv...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Not so well on iOS devices by my experience,  however that may have
> > been
> > > a
> > > > one off.
> > > > On 24 Oct 2013 18:44, "Dave Park" <d...@sinclairql.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Skype is the only stable mass market video platform that allows
> > > multiple
> > > > > callers/conferencing that is PC, Mac and Linux compatible and free
> to
> > > > use.
> > > > > That's why I use it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dave
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Mark Martin <
> > storycraf...@gmail.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Recent discussions about holding a physical meeting have gotten
> me
> > > > > > thinking. Someone mentioned skyping as a possibility, and I can
> > tell
> > > > you
> > > > > > that another retro computing group (the CoCo group) have held
> > > > online-only
> > > > > > events in the past. These were very informal and low-key, and
> while
> > > > they
> > > > > > were repeated only a handful of times, they were extremely easy
> to
> > > > > > coordinate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Along that line, I'm offering for your consideration two
> proposals:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- The informal approach is that I will lead an effort to
> determine
> > > the
> > > > > > most common IM program used among interested parties (hopefully
> > > > Skype). I
> > > > > > will collect contact information and then schedule a first call.
> > I'll
> > > > try
> > > > > > to gather consensus on a schedule and an agenda. In other words,
> I
> > > will
> > > > > > facilitate and then happily let others lead discussions they are
> > > > > interested
> > > > > > in.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- The Big Bang approach is to model after what the virtual
> > tabletop
> > > > > > role-playing conventions do -- they host schedules for individual
> > > > tables,
> > > > > > and allow interested parties to lead those "tables". They allow
> > > signup
> > > > > for
> > > > > > these tables and coordinate all of the interested parties into a
> > > > > > (essentially) private meeting space. These are essentially a
> large
> > > > > online,
> > > > > > virtual convention -- but focused on smaller interest topics (in
> > this
> > > > > case,
> > > > > > individual role playing game sessions). I could perhaps leverage
> > > > websites
> > > > > > that cater to this type of convention and, again, help facilitate
> > > > smaller
> > > > > > groups to get together at various times over some pre-planned
> > > > convention
> > > > > > weekend.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I do not intend to step on Quantas toes here as I know they are
> > > > > separately
> > > > > > trying to schedule a more robust and higher scale venture. I'm
> more
> > > > > > interested in seeing if there is interest in something a lot less
> > > > formal,
> > > > > > on the side, and not necessarily tied to any Quanta business --
> > > global
> > > > in
> > > > > > scale. I have very little to no budget to do this, although I
> > believe
> > > > > there
> > > > > > isn't much need for such a budget.  This is mostly a volunteer
> time
> > > > kind
> > > > > of
> > > > > > thing for all parties.
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > QL-Users Mailing List
> > > > > > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Dave Park
> > > > > Sandy Electronics, LLC
> > > > > d...@sinclairql.com
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > QL-Users Mailing List
> > > > > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > QL-Users Mailing List
> > > > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dave Park
> > > Sandy Electronics, LLC
> > > d...@sinclairql.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > QL-Users Mailing List
> > > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > QL-Users Mailing List
> > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Park
> Sandy Electronics, LLC
> d...@sinclairql.com
> _______________________________________________
> QL-Users Mailing List
> http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
>
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to