In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> , Norman Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >the fact that I have to hunt for the disc means I never use it either - C68 >is so much better and less buggy. I don't think Dave Walker (and his >brother) get enough recognition for the work they do. I for one am very >grateful to them. Yes, it definitely made the QL a viable platform to have a good version of C, as well as its native SuperBASIC. -- Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Dave Walker
- Re: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Anthony W . Prime
- Re: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Dave Westbury
- RE: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Dave Walker
- RE: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Peter S Tillier
- Re: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Arnould Nazarian
- RE: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M Dent Jonathan