> > IMHO what should be done is to leave WMAN alone and work > on an entire new PE that could give the QL a whole new GUI, I for one completely disagree with this. There is Prowess as others said, and there are certainly things to do at lower level the GUI in SMSQ/E. Arnould
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SM... Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SM... Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SM... Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SM... Dexter
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Arnould Nazarian
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Dexter
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E John G Hitchcock
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E ZN
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Dexter
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E ZN
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Jerome Grimbert
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] The future of SMSQ/E Tony Firshman