Do I hear the sound of rattles being thrown out of prams once more, children?
I spent a long time in my role as QL Today editor trying to get views aired and presenting both sides of the hardware vs emulators etc etc debates. Here we go again. For goodness's sake, bury the hatchets now (and I don't mean in each other's heads). This is rapidly turning into another all too public slanging match we can well do without. Sort out your differences in private if you can, then tell those of us who are still listening what came of it all. You've all done excellent work - Peter designing the Qx0 and Marcel, Tony, Jochen, Wolfgang and all with the OS. That's all we needed to know. -- Dilwyn Jones ----- Original Message ----- From: SMSQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [ql-users] QLwIP, Ethernet, USB, Q60 successor > > > Most Q60 users??? AFAIKS the number of Q60 users who requested _upgrade_ > > of SMSQ/E binaries to _your_ versions is ZERO in about one and a half > > year. Which proves total failure of your "only through reseller" concept. > > > > Sure SMSQ/E is still used on most Q60, but this is for 99% an achievement > > of Tony Tebby and not your new facilities. > > Well, if that is REALLY the case, then both you two, Marcel and > Wolfgang, completely wasted your time for the last 1 1/2 years > in supporting it. > > If there is absolutely no demand, then I suggest you > concentrate on the users who appreciate your work, > i.e. QPC and GoldCard etc. SMSQ/E users. > > Jochen > > >
