Forwarded answer from Peter to my last mail, posted with his agreement. I leave it at that. --- Marcel wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Of course not. It's not Jochen who actually suggested that NO Qx0 user > >> uses the new SMSQ/E. If that was the case, we could really have saved > >> a lot of time. Obviously this assertion is, to speak plainly, rubbish. > > So read _exactly_ what I wrote, before using nice words. > >Been there, done that. OK, you wrote "AFAIKS" (what does the "S" stand >for?), which implies that you just don't know anybody who upgraded. >But was that what you wanted to say? Sorry I misspelled. AFAICS=As far as I can see. I wanted to say that through the "only by reseller" route (the only way for an ordinary user who can not build SMSQ from source himself) not even a single Q60 user had updated to your new version in about one and a half year. I think this is correct. > > Forget this idea. I never sold nor trusted Q60 SMSQ/E versions after > > Tony Tebby. > >Pitty. The new versions do wonder for disc access speed. Which is about the only little thing that would be of some interest for me, although I heard it was an Atari fastram style workaround rather than a clean removal of slaveing, and caused other bugs. (I can't judge that.) However it is not worth accepting your license (for me, IMHO). Peter
