Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ?

[Henning Brauer]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:32:39PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Henning Brauer wrote: 
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:16:44PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > > > Clustering is a bit misleading for this qmail-ldap technique. You want a big
> > > > NetApps Filer and mount the users maildirs on each machine via NFS.  
> > > NetApp Filer is too expensive for us right now, but we'll probably buy
> > > one if the system grows :)
> > Big systems cost big money.
> > The only alternative is a BSD based filer. Linux NFS is, eh, .. wel, you get
> > the idea.
> BTW, does *BSD support Mylex AcceleRAID 170 or Adaptec 2100S  ?

http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html

> I have not much experience with BSD yet.
> One more off-topic question - what are the problems with Linux NFS
> implemetation ? I've heard about locking issues...

It's fast but unreliable.
-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany               *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)