On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:31:04PM -0400, Mike Cathey wrote: > Henning, > Could you please elaborate on thist statement (or point me to a doc that > I might have missed)? That's absed on experience ;-)). 0501 has some issues with catchall and I didn't update my machines, thus I did not test my patches as extensively as usual and they may have issues with 0501, too. > I was able to patch 0501 with -ldap and LDAP/Control. This was on a > test machine that hasn't been used in production. > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > >>No, please use 0301. Neither 0501 nor the additional patches for it are as > >>stable as 0301. > >> > >>-- > >>* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * > > > -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
