On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Henning Brauer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:18:28PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > > > > > > No, please use 0301. Neither 0501 nor the additional patches for it are as > > > stable as 0301. > > > > What known issues are there with 0501 ? > > Already explained it, aside from a thousand hits in the archives. "Life with > qmail-ldap" contains the archive's URL. I know where's the archive ... Reviewing last 3 months postings, I've found the following problems mentioned: - objectclass + catchall problem - deliveryProgramPath not allowing ./ - 2 letters long addresses - posts to <nothing_here>@domain silently being dropped away - dash-trick uninitialised variables - correected in 0306 ? - deliverymode=reply,localdeliver - crashes Hmm, is it all ? Are there really all bugs listed above in 20010501 ? Did I miss anything ? Why not to start issue tracking system (like OpenLDAP's) ? It would save many people's time... Actually I see this project is a great job, but still it's a little mess ;) -=Czaj-nick=-
