On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 03:53:36PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > > Reviewing last 3 months postings, I've found the following problems > > mentioned: > > > > - objectclass + catchall problem Ups, still not fixed... but the fix is in the CVS (which is dead at the moment :( ) > > - deliveryProgramPath not allowing ./ This is not a bug, check check.c and QLDAPNEWS. > > - 2 letters long addresses Could somebody reproduce that error? Is it a catchall bug or something other? > > - posts to <nothing_here>@domain silently being dropped away This is not a bug this is correct (see rfc 821/822). > > - dash-trick uninitialised variables - correected in 0306 ? > > yes, fixed there. The problem was existant for many many months and nobody > discovered it, uninitialized variables seem to have value 0 on nearly all > systems - the problem here is "nearly", we finally found one where it had > another value and triggered the problem. > Not our problem. > > - deliverymode=reply,localdeliver - crashes > > Not all combinations of deliverymode work right now, this needs a bit more > rework. I don't know how far Andre and Claudio did fix the problems, I'm > planning to dig further into this area when the next patch arrives. > Is this not a 20010301 problem? I remember I fixed a bug when using reply. I used one var for two datastructures at the same time. This has some side effects. > > Hmm, is it all ? Are there really all bugs listed above in 20010501 ? > > All known at least. > > > Did I miss anything ? > There was a NS-MTA-MD5 bug that was fixed somewhen ago. Also the problems with the TLS patch comes to mind (we need to upgrade to a newer version of this patch (or probably rewrite it a bit)). There were a few problems in the 0301 patch that where fixed but have a look at the QLDAPNEWS file of the 0501 patch. > > Why not to start issue tracking system (like OpenLDAP's) ? It would save > > many people's time... > > This is IMHO a good idea, as well as a public CVS would be - the latter is > impossible due to Dan's licensing, unfortunately. > Perhaps you allready realized that Andre and I are terribly overloaded with other work and so we try to maintain the patch. If anybody has the knowledge and the time to install such a system it would be cool. As soon as our CVS is running again (machine died a horrible death) I try to automate the patch generation. I hope that until end of this week a new patch is released with at least some bugfixes. OK now back to work... -- :wq Claudio tail -22 QLDAPINSTALL
