Henning Brauer wrote:
> It never can be as secure as OpenBSD. Have a look at the sources.
"Having a look at the sources" certainly isn't a justification why one
is better than the other. What specifically about Linux is broken as
compared to BSD?
> It's a matter of fact that qmail isn't as reliable on Linux as on *BSD as it
> relies on some FFS semantics ext2fs just doen not fulfill.
If that is the case then there is a bug in qmail - the software should
be correct to the system underneath it, not apply semantics that aren't
supported and say "it's their problem, not ours...!" when it doesn't
work properly.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
- hardware sizing ? Fran�ois Philippo
- Re: hardware sizing ? Henning Brauer
- Re: hardware sizing ? Graham Leggett
- hardware sizing ? Fran�ois Philippo
- Re: hardware sizing ? Henning Brauer
- Re: hardware sizing ? Charles Cazabon
- Re: hardware sizing ? Dan Melomedman
- Re: hardware sizing ? Henning Brauer
- Re: hardware sizing ? Graham Leggett
- Re: hardware sizing ? Dan Melomedman
- Re: hardware sizing ? Dan Melomedman
- Re: hardware sizing ? Henning Brauer
- Re: hardware sizing ? Henning Brauer
- Re: hardware sizing ? Dan Melomedman
- Re: hardware sizing ? Adam McKenna
- Re: hardware sizing ? Dan Melomedman
- Re: hardware sizing ? Martin
- Re: hardware sizing ? Mike Cathey
- Re: hardware sizing ? Dan Melomedman
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature