Henning Brauer wrote:

> It never can be as secure as OpenBSD. Have a look at the sources.

"Having a look at the sources" certainly isn't a justification why one
is better than the other. What specifically about Linux is broken as
compared to BSD?

> It's a matter of fact that qmail isn't as reliable on Linux as on *BSD as it
> relies on some FFS semantics ext2fs just doen not fulfill.

If that is the case then there is a bug in qmail - the software should
be correct to the system underneath it, not apply semantics that aren't
supported and say "it's their problem, not ours...!" when it doesn't
work properly.

Regards,
Graham
-- 
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                "There's a moon
                                        over Bourbon Street
                                                tonight..."

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to