So is 20010802i, considered stable?
I'm still running 20010301, and I'm about to upgrade for some features, I
need. I'd like to know if I should consider 20010802i, instead.
Kyle Stone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Henning Brauer wrote:
> If you had wrapped you lines at 72 chars I could reply in a reasonable way,
> but this way...
> If the LDAP server doesn't respond the mail is requeued. There was a bug in
> older versions (immediately after the timeouts were thrown in) where a mail
> got bounced once the timeout was reached. Update your installation to
> qmail-ldap 20010802i.
>
> --
> * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
> * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
> Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
> (Dennis Ritchie)
>
