Re: Periodic problems with qmail-ldap

[Henning Brauer]

On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 10:05:11AM -0400, Charlie ROOT wrote:
> So is 20010802i, considered stable?

yes. I'm happy with it (but wasn't with 0501 at all).

> I'm still running 20010301, and I'm about to upgrade for some features, I
> need.  I'd like to know if I should consider 20010802i, instead.

-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany               *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)