I have seen you many times criticize Solaris, but I have not seen any
reasoning as to why. I have a collection of Sun hardware, all of it running
Solaris 8, and I do not have any problems with it. And particularly not
with e-mail.
So I ask, can you explain why you believe so fervently that Solaris is such
a horrible operating system? Unless of course it's just the traditional
"BSD vs. SVR4 vs Linux vs yadda yadda yadda", in which case no explanation
is necessary).
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henning Brauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: sizing qmail-ldap
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:23:48PM -0300, Federico Edelman Anaya wrote:
> > What hardware is appropiate for the NFS Server? Sun E-250? Sun E-450?
> > Sun E-220?
>
> Slowlaris is a bad choice for nearly any internet server in general and
> mailservers in special.
>
> > What is the most advice method for storage? NFS?
>
> Use a NetApp Filer for NFS and BSD-based servers with qmail-ldap.
> Search the archives for really long discussions about sizing. and search
the
> main qmail lists archive, too.
>
> --
> * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
> * BS Web Services, Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
> Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
> (Dennis Ritchie)
>
>
