On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:23:18PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Henning Brauer wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 07:44:03PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote: > > > If you need some indicator on a per address basis (e.g. from some .qmail > > > files but not from others) I wouldn't add a new field but add > > > "Precedence: bulk". > > > > I thought about this, too. The more I think about it the more I think it is > > the best solution. A mail forwarded to more than one person can be > > considered like a mailing list mail, and thus precendence: bulk makes really > > sense. For qmail-ldap, adding this whenever there is more than one > > mailForwardingAddress attribute should be fairly easy to implement. > > Maex, Henning, many thanks! This makes much more sense than the > forwarded-to header I wanted to invent. > > Ok, have put enhancement into qmail-ldap. Will be in 20011101. > Let's try it out and see where it will produce problems. I don't want another switch in the Makefile that turns an option on/off. But as Henning pointed out: multiple forwarders are equal to a mailing list (I even know people that are implementing mailinglist in such a way). So let's patch qmail-local.c...
On the other hand the right thing(tm) is probably a better qmail-reply which connects to the ldap server and reads all necessary stuff form there. So it could be simple to add a more sophisticated configuration to the reply tool. -- :wq Claudio tail -23 QLDAPINSTALL
