Henning Brauer wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:49:07AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > > Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There are a number of generic accounts on the system (such as info@ > > > and sales@) which are only forwarded to a number of people but are > > > not a mailbox by themselfes. > > Fine. > > > The problem that came up now is that if one of those recipients sets a > > > reply message also the senders of mail to the generic address get a > > > reply. > > It's not quite clear what you mean. You mean if pat@public sends a > > message to info@domain, the message goes to joe@domain and sam@domain -- > > correct so far (given I understood Andre). > > > and then if joe replies to the message, his MUA sends a copy to both > > pat@public and info@domain? > > no. joe@ has a autoresponder (he's at vacation or what else) and and > pat@public gets a message stating joe@ is at vacation. but sam@ is not and > will process the message. What Andre wants is a possibility for the > autoresponder to detect this situation and not to respond at all.
Yes, exactly! (My brain is somewhat complex today so probably I don't do nice sentences) -- Andre
