Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>     adi> I guess he has applied Russell's 'big-todo' patch.
>     >>  AHHH, yes I have. Is that a problem?
> 
>     Andre> Yes, because now you have to teach qmail-todo.c about the
>     Andre> different queue directory structure as well.
> 
> I see. Now comes the question, should I teach it, or ignore the big-todo?

Depends on how many messages you'll have in the queue. If you have
more than 50'000 or so I guess big-todo would help some.

> Do I gain anything with big-todo with a external todo, isn't that the
> point with it, that it will be faster?

Big-todo only helps if you have many many messages in the queue. With
the standard queue layout you'll have many thousand files in one
directory on which normal filesystems don't perform well. Big-todo
simply makes a larger and deeper directory structure so you'll have
less files per directory. Thats all. There is no direct relationship
to or between this and ext-todo.

-- 
Andre

Reply via email to