For we who don't know deeply about these issues... Why are maintained two different trees for qmail-ldap and qmail-ldap-control? And why very commonly used and tricky-to-patch packages like SMTP-AUTH aren't included in none of these trees?
I think that the work Turbo is doing is really worth a merge into the qmail-ldap main tree, just like the smtp-auth patch.... why aren't they? Thank you guys for doing such a good work, we have one of the best MTA platforms available at no cost and with the sources available, and issues like the above ones make using this platform more difficult than (I think) it should be. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Turbo Fredriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 3:28 PM Subject: Re: ldap-control > >>>>> "Taymour" == Taymour A El Erian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Taymour> I have QmailLDAP v20020501a and QmailLDAP/Controls > Taymour> v20020524 > > Those work for me... Start fresh, and give me the output (and input, ie > commandlines) for what happens when you add the QmailLDAP/Controls patch... > > Taymour> Isn't there anyway you could sync the version > Taymour> no. so that no confusion will occur > > Not unless it's accepted 'upstream' (ie, by the QmailLDAP maintainers). > -- > Nazi class struggle SDI PLO South Africa toluene Peking Ortega killed > World Trade Center Marxist cryptographic Cuba congress North Korea > [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this] >
