>>>>> "Francisco" == Francisco Lozano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Francisco> Why are maintained two different trees for qmail-ldap and
Francisco> qmail-ldap-control?
>From what I understand, the QmailLDAP maintainers don't like my patch
(or specially the way it works). I agree in what they say, but until
someone takes the time to work around the problem, there's nothing 'wrong'
with it...
The problem is that it opens up a connection for every time the configs
are to be read. That means once every SMTP connection, once every LOCAL
deliver (and probabaly a couple of times more that i haven't bothered with :).
Francisco> I think that the work Turbo is doing is really worth a
Francisco> merge into the qmail-ldap main tree, just like the
Francisco> smtp-auth patch.
Thanx. I know that there are quite a number of people that use my patch.
--
class struggle FSF Cocaine jihad SDI NSA nuclear kibo $400 million in
gold bullion cracking tritium iodine pits BATF Treasury
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
