Re: Three solutions for spam

[Mike Meyer]

> On Mon, 1 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Sounds like an opportunity for someone to jump in and offer up an SMTP
> > end point service.  Since port 25 won't be reachable, options include
> > using another port (can qmail be configured to send and receive on any
> > arbitrary port?) or tunnelling.  How would it be secured?  Would qmail
> > handle it securely?  If by IP address, can qmail make sure the IP is
> > not spoofed?  Personally I like the idea of tunnels since that gives a
> > number of other options, too.
> 
> Do you really think there's a service for this? If so, I'd be willing

Ack. Make that "Do you really think there's a MARKET for this?" If so, I'd ...

        <mike