On Fri 1999-02-19 (15:22), Rok Papez wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 09:05:31 -0500, Mark Bainter wrote:
>
> >Just use mutt. ( http://www.mutt.org )
> >
> >(And yes, I'm not using it now. Qmail comes to my work account because
> >I'm too lazy to move it. I use mutt for all my other lists and it works
> >great. It is able to recognize lists and when you want to reply to a
> >list address it can handle it w/no need to munge reply-to's. Check it
> >out.)
>
> I tried it... It wasn't pleasent for use. I'm used to PINE, joe,
> PMMail.
> Mutt is a step in a totaly new direction, I know it is more powerful;
> but I PINE is a lot more intuitive for use (for me that is ) :).
I hear this sort of thing a lot. I wish that someone would take the innards
of mutt and package them up nicely so that people can write nice interfaces
to sit on top of it. That way we'd have all the cool features of mutt (and
hopefully some from other MUAs that mutt doesn't have) with an interface to
suit everyones taste. Anyone keen? :-) ....maybe one day when I have time...
- Keith
> Rok Papez,
--
Keith Burdis - MSc (Com Sci) - Rhodes University, South Africa
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW : http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~keith/
IRC : Panthras JAPH
"Any technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from a perl script"
Standard disclaimer.
---
