>It was quite standard at each company to send email direct through >dialup, w/valid return address of company email, to save phone costs >and company bandwidth. > >Are you suggesting there is something wrong with this? Yes, in today's environment, you'll lose a lot of mail. Dialup filtering is already here. ISPs all over the place do it. I can think of a couple of sensible approaches for travelling users: * Relay the mail host of the ISP you're dialed into. That's what I do. * Set up a tunnel back to headquarters (easy now that there's a standard albeit not very secure tunnel package provided with Windows) and be a host on your home network. -- John R. Levine, IECC, POB 727, Trumansburg NY 14886 +1 607 387 6869 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Village Trustee and Sewer Commissioner, http://iecc.com/johnl, Member, Provisional board, Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- Re: Three solutions for spam Luca Olivetti
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Peter van Dijk
- RE: Three solutions for spam Soffen, Matthew
- Re: Three solutions for spam Lorens Kockum
- Re: Three solutions for spam Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- RE: Three solutions for spam John R. Levine
- RE: Three solutions for spam Soffen, Matthew
- RE: Three solutions for spam Soffen, Matthew
- Re: Three solutions for spam Lorens Kockum
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Edward S. Marshall
- Re: Three solutions for spam l41484