On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Edward S. Marshall wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Invalid assumption; you do not have the "right" to send me mail. You -may- > > > be able to send me mail if you pass my "arbitrary criteria". > > > > Do you warn your customers, that they may never receive legitimate mail? > > Of course. Anything else would be a disservice to them, and a legal > liability to me. Really? Well the good news are, u show some wisdowm, the bad news i would never use your services. :-) I prefer to get some spam (which in fact i do, i don't count it, but's something like 3-4 messages a day) than to lose legitimate mail. -- Tiago Pascoal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX : +351-1-7273394 Politicamente incorrecto, e membro (nao muito) proeminente da geracao rasca.
- Re: Three solutions for spam John R. Levine
- RE: Three solutions for spam Soffen, Matthew
- RE: Three solutions for spam Soffen, Matthew
- Re: Three solutions for spam Lorens Kockum
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Edward S. Marshall
- Re: Three solutions for spam l41484
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Three solutions for spam Andy Smith
- Re: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam l41484
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery