I got around this problem with my users by telling them that MDN is a better read reciept technology. It provides a true read reciept. DSN is just a delivery reciept. However, I understand that there are a lot of e-mail clients which don't support both forms of read reciepts. - eric "Ferri Andy Ch." escribió: > > Hi all, > > I posted this DSN issue last week, and not a single response to it. Is there any body > care about this feature? > > DSN is very important to me, and I believe also important for a lot of people, and > it's very shame to discover that qmail (claimed as more advance than sendmail) > not support this feature. Security is top priority in qmail, as far as I know, but > how come the nice security support feature like DSN is out of questions? > Please at least someone give me a good reason why, or maybe explain to me that > DSN is not so important as I think now. I really appreciate any kind of response. > At least I know that this qmail community is as friendly and helpful as any other > Linux community. > > Best regards, > Ferri Andy Ch. > > -- > // chandy a7 cbn 607 net 607 id -------/ > // Linux kernel 2.2.5 XFree86 3.3.2.3 > // Glib/Gtk 1.2.1 Enlightenment 0.16 > // Mozilla 4.51 -------/ -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Spark Sistemas E-mail - presentado por IWCC Argentina S.A. Tel: 4702-1958 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
