russ, all, a quick question below... On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, Russell Nelson wrote: > > Is there any ballpark threshhold where these changes become useful? > > My rule of thumb is that every directory should have <1000 files in it. is this filesystem-dependant? ie: does this assume the fs is using some O(n) algorithm for directories (some, like XFS on IRIX and newer fs's for linux like Reiserfs (i believe) use BTrees for directories giving them O(logn) behavior, which should mean massively larger numbers of files in a directory without a performance hit). maybe i'm misunderstanding the point of the change, though. todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! Russell Nelson
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! jeremy
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! Russell Nelson
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! jeremy
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! Fabrice Scemama
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! Markus Stumpf
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! Russell Nelson
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! jeremy
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! Keith Burdis
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! Russell Nelson
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! Todd at NM Technet
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! Russell Nelson
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! Matthew Harrell
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! jeremy
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! jeremy
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Trying to achieve maximum speed! jeremy
- Re: Virus scanning with qmail+amavis (Take 2) Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Virus scanning with qmail+amavis (Take 2) Adam D . McKenna