On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 01:25:15AM -0400, Scott Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Command-line arguments are RFC821 addresses, but body addresses are > | RFC822 addresses. > > I'm only talking about the envelope (rfc821 addresses). It's > inconsistent that qmail-smtpd strips the quotes from the envelope while > qmail-inject doesn't. I ask this here a while back. The answer is that the arguments to qmail-inject are raw email addresses, they are NOT encoded. It is annoying that sendmail does things differently. This can cause problems for programs, such as mutt, when using addresses that need to be quoted, since the arguments it needs to pass are different for qmail-inject and sendmail.
- New spammer exploit (seen on Bugtraq) David Dyer-Bennet
- RE: New spammer exploit (seen on Bugtraq) David Harris
- RE: New spammer exploit (seen on Bugtraq) David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: New spammer exploit (seen on Bugtraq) Bruno Wolff III
- Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer ex... Scott Schwartz
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New sp... Russell Nelson
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: Ne... Scott Schwartz
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (R... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope... Scott Schwartz
- Re: Eliding quotes in enve... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Eliding quotes in enve... Scott Schwartz
- Re: Eliding quotes in enve... Sam
- Re: Eliding quotes in enve... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Eliding quotes in enve... Sam
- Re: Eliding quotes in enve... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Eliding quotes in enve... Sam
- Re: Eliding quotes in enve... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Eliding quotes in enve... Scott Schwartz