On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Fabrice Scemama wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (...) > > Currently I'm using RBL, DUL, and RSS. It stops almost all spam > > attempts to this machine, but then this is a .gov, and spammers seem > > to stay away from .gov addresses. > > So, we finally have THE universal solution against spam! > what about opening .forward accounts to everyone ? > -- no kidding! They also seem to stay away from .org addresses as well (for the most part). A .org address is a lot easier to get than a .gov. Cheers, Vern -- \ \ / __| _ \ \ | Vern Hart \ \ / _| / . | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \_/ ___|_|_\_|\_|
- How good is RBL at filtering spam? David Harris
- Re: How good is RBL at filtering spam? James J. Lippard
- Re: How good is RBL at filtering spam? schinder
- RE: How good is RBL at filtering spam? David Harris
- RE: How good is RBL at filtering spam? David Harris
- Re: How good is RBL at filtering spam? Markus Stumpf
- Re: How good is RBL at filtering s... Peter Green
- Re: How good is RBL at filteri... Alex Rubenstein
- Re: How good is RBL at filtering spam? Fabrice Scemama
- Re: How good is RBL at filtering spam? Vern Hart
- Re: How good is RBL at filtering spam? James Smallacombe
- Re: How good is RBL at filtering s... schinder
- Re: How good is RBL at filteri... Dave Sill
- Re: How good is RBL at fil... schinder
- Re: How good is RBL at fil... James Smallacombe
- Re: How good is RBL at fil... M Graff
- Re: How good is RBL at filteri... M Graff
- Re: How good is RBL at filtering spam? Nathan J. Mehl
- Re: How good is RBL at filtering spam? James Smallacombe