On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 15:39:28 -0400 (EDT) Dave Sill wrote: > However, should you chose to attempt a band-aid for a key remote site, > the approach would be to install a second qmail with a lower > concurrencyremote and redirect messages for the swamped site from the > primary qmail to the secondary. Or use serialmail. This limits the concurrency to one and you'll have to trigger serialmail from time to time, but it is easier I think to install serialmail for a few band-aided sites than to have qmail installations multiplying. Regards, Giles
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a specific host Markus Stumpf
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a specific host Russell Nelson
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a specific ... Tony Gale
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a speci... Stan Horwitz
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a speci... Russell Nelson
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a speci... Mirko Zeibig
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a speci... Magnus Bodin
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a speci... Russell Nelson
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a speci... Mirko Zeibig
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a specific host Dave Sill
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a specific host Giles Lean
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a specific host John R. Levine
- Re: Concurrencyremote for a specific host Anand Buddhdev