Post.Office is simple, it runs under NT, any idiot can set it up, and it's
user interface is better then the current web-configurators for
qmail/sendmail/anything else I've seen. It's also crappy. Delivery is
slow, can't grow well past about 200 users, can't handle large volumes of
email, doesn't log nearly enough data to track a message. It's capable of
losing messages in daily operations.
In other words, beats me.
-Peter
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 11:04:31AM -0600, Shawn P. Stanley wrote:
> Why is postoffice so popular?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Shawn P. Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Qmail List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 11:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Sendmail vs Qmail?
>
>
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 10:35:09AM -0600, Shawn P. Stanley wrote:
> > > As for the intentions of RedHat when trying to purchase Corel, I thought
> it
> > > had more to do with WordPerfect and other related office tools. Such
> tools
> > > are everything in the Linux vs. Microsoft market share war.
> >
> > Sorry, I thought it was clear that I was kidding. But the rest of my
> > message contained facts---but to interpret them properly, please note
> > I have been using qmail exclusively since 1996---despite the fact that
> > our University switched to postoffice.
> >
> > Mate
> >
>
--
The 5 year plan:
In five years we'll make up another plan.
Or just re-use this one.
