-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 20 Dec 99, at 5:18, Sam wrote:
> Are you really saying that it is now necessary to jump through hoops in
> order to support Qmail on the back-end?  Why should I figure out anything,
> just for the sake of switching to Qmail?  There's no need for me to figure
> out how to make it easy.  It's already easy: sendmail takes care of those
> things for me, automatically.

So does Win98. Does that, like, prove anything?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html

iQA/AwUBOF4V2lMwP8g7qbw/EQIPVACghEJvYTX57RlW/sRXUlOt3eAbvBQAn0FJ
yH4gKV6zrkAtqZRLxCQYcfy3
=MVqe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
                                                             [Tom Waits]

Reply via email to