Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:26:00 -0400 From: Brian Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> the person could just simply not be checking their e-mail, or you could've mistyped the address, or a million other things, so you just plain can't depend on the system, but the more checks you put in, the more you make the system _look_ perfect, the more easy you make it for users to assume that is _is_ perfect... You seem to be saying that there is no point to improving something unless we can make it perfect. However, I think we can all agree that in this world nothing is ever perfect. Therefore, you seem to be saying that we should never try to improve anything. If that isn't what you mean, then what do you mean? I'm not saying we should make things perfect. I'm saying we should make things better. And the first step is realizing that things are not good enough--or, in other words, that they are not perfect. Ian
- Re: temporary failure warning message Thomas Blauvelt
- Re: temporary failure warning message Dave Sill
- Re: temporary failure warning message Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: temporary failure warning message Dave Sill
- Re: temporary failure warning message Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: temporary failure warning message Russell Nelson
- Re: temporary failure warning message Dave Sill
- Re: temporary failure warning message Brian Johnson
- Re: temporary failure warning message Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: temporary failure warning message Brian Johnson
- Re: temporary failure warning message Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: temporary failure warning message Adam McKenna
- Re: temporary failure warning message Adam McKenna
- Re: temporary failure warning message Kai MacTane
- Re: temporary failure warning message Adam McKenna
- Re: temporary failure warning message Adam McKenna
- Re: temporary failure warning message Brian Johnson
- Re: temporary failure warning message Racer X
- Re: temporary failure warning message Russ Allbery
- Re: temporary failure warning message Russ Allbery
- Re: temporary failure warning message Rogerio Brito