"David L. Nicol" wrote: > Keith Warno wrote: > > > > there should be no need to "hack" qmail > > And there isn't! Why do people persist on insecure MUAs? My sentiment exactly. Why should I have to expend valuable time and resources fixing Microsofts dud ware. Here in .au there are rumblings of legislation for ISPs to block virii, these people have no concept of the difference between a virus and a worm or any other type of exploit, yet pressure is mounting on ISPs and, if legislated, means ISPs will be liable for loss and damage and loss of production because MS constantly fail to secure their systems. To effect this type of policy one would need to prohibit all attachments, scan each mail for vb/java script and why not peersonally read/censure each mail </rant> Kevin
- Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worms/etc? Keith Warno
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worms/et... Dave Sill
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worm... Anthony DeBoer
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worms/et... markd
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worms/et... Patrick Berry
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worms/et... David L. Nicol
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worm... Kevin Waterson
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/... Paul Farber
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about v... Alex Shipp
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/... Alex Shipp
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worm... Steve Wolfe
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/... Russell Nelson
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about v... Mrs. Brisby
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about v... Alex Shipp
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about v... Steve Wolfe
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/... Bruno Wolff III