clemensF writes:
> > Petr Novotny:
>
> > As in "sendmail is superior to qmail because it doesn't eat up
> > space in process table". (Overheard this just an hour ago...)
>
> which is why qmail, consisting of many *small* programs, is vwery well
> suited to unix. if you read the source, you will find a very unix-stylish
> program set.
Yup. And its configuration language is the shell, whereas sendmail's
configuration language is a customize language that's so obtuse and
obscure even Sendmail Inc. advises users not to use it.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok |
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | Is Unix compatible with
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | Linux?