I would be really interested in seeing those numbers in the FAQ somewhere ...

Charles Cazabon wrote:

> A few people have done the math; MTAs which aggregate recipients to save
> bandwidth tend to have more overhead network bandwith (additional MX lookups,
> etc), and the savings is not as great as a first guess might make it look.
> It has to be a pretty pathological case (large mail, many recipients at
> one MX) for it to be consistently faster.

Reply via email to