I would be really interested in seeing those numbers in the FAQ somewhere ... Charles Cazabon wrote: > A few people have done the math; MTAs which aggregate recipients to save > bandwidth tend to have more overhead network bandwith (additional MX lookups, > etc), and the savings is not as great as a first guess might make it look. > It has to be a pretty pathological case (large mail, many recipients at > one MX) for it to be consistently faster.
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Frank Tegtmeyer
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Greg Owen
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Russell Nelson
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Mark Mentovai
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Mark Mentovai
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Petr Novotny
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Charles Cazabon
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Charles Cazabon
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Michael T. Babcock
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Abdul Rehman Gani
- orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! John R. Dunning
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... David Dyer-Bennet
- orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... John R. Dunning
- Attitude Michael T. Babcock
- Re: Attitude markd
- Re: Attitude David Dyer-Bennet