Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying!

[David Dyer-Bennet]

John R. Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 21 July 2000 at 15:40:59 -0000

 > I like qmail a lot.  It's way easier to deal with than sendmail, and
 > does a good job for my purposes.  There are some things which I wish
 > it did differently.  This business of not bothering to consolidate
 > deliveries of recipients at a common host (or mx) into a common
 > connection is one of them.

How would you suggest that this be performed without destroying the
simple, secure, structure of qmail?  And what would the cost in
increased DNS traffic and increased disk bandwidth be?  

That is, have you considered this carefully enough to be able to make
an actual proposal on how to do it, or are you just blowing smoke and
assuming it's easy and cheap?
-- 
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon
Bookworms: http://ouroboros.demesne.com/ SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b 
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]