[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc) wrote: >Theoretically, BIND's noncompliance with standards is wrong. In >practice, it interoperates with most of the world (i.e., itself) just >fine. But I care. I'll care about "void main" when it causes me problems. Until then, I've got real problems to worry about. -Dave
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Adam McKenna
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Mark Mentovai
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! John White
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Dave Sill
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Michael T. Babcock
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Mark Mentovai
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Dave Sill
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Paul Jarc
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Michael T. Babcock
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Dave Sill
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Michael T. Babcock
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Petr Novotny
- Re: void main Jan Echternach
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Peter van Dijk
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Michael T. Babcock