On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 01:48:00AM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote: > 2) It is *not* the frigging MX record. That has nothing to do with it. Any > mailer that breaks when there is only an A record is a broken mailer. And who says so? I'm sure every mailer SHOULD fall back to the A record, but the RFCs don't demand it. Jost -- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please help stamp out spam! | | Postmaster, JAPH, resident answer machine am RZ der RUB | | Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate | | William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) |
- Why qmail can not receive hotmail messages? hbchen163
- RE: Why qmail can not receive hotmail messages? Brett Randall
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail messages? Jack O'Toole
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail message... hbchen163
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail message... Adam McKenna
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail messages? hbchen163
- RE: Why qmail can not receive hotmail message... Brett Randall
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail mes... Adam McKenna
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmai... Jost Krieger
- Re: Why qmail can not receive ho... Dave Sill
- Re: Why qmail can not receive ho... Adam McKenna
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... Jack O'Toole
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... Dave Sill
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... Adam McKenna
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... Chris Garrigues
- RE: Why qmail can not receiv... Brett Randall
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... hbchen163
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... Petr Novotny
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail message... Jason Brooke